Re: The Barracks needs a new forum logo!
![! :!:](./images/smilies/icon_exclaim.gif)
Moderators: Elite Guard Officers, Executive Officers
SlntCobra1 wrote:Ismael92 wrote:What are you talking about? Color BBCode was already available in the old forums, yet you never used it so much :/
Also, this post is very gay
oh dear god! Looking at the coding for it, it's fuckin' spammy! HALP! Bow? I think not!
SlntCobra1 wrote:LMFAO! Ok, as funny as this is, if we don't get back on topic, I'm going to have to delete those posts and/or lock and remake this thread.
:!:
ByteSlinger wrote:SlntCobra1 wrote:Ismael92 wrote:What are you talking about? Color BBCode was already available in the old forums, yet you never used it so much :/
Also, this post is very gay :D
oh dear god! Looking at the coding for it, it's fuckin' spammy! HALP! Bow? I think not!
Well, I cheated. I wrote a macro in Excel that takes a line of text and inserts color codes after each character. Did it just for lulz. It'll wear off soon…
SlntCobra1 wrote:There is a problem with it, this topic is becoming too spammy. Don't test me, ok? I like having fun as much as the rest of y'all, but I will not let the topic get too far off course. :\
SlntCobra1 wrote:Ok, I do see your point, just let's get back to the topic at hand, ok?
![]()
SlntCobra1 wrote:Ok, I do see your point, just let's get back to the topic at hand, ok?
![]()
Ismael92 wrote:Being a mod doesn't mean that you must be a party pooper and enforce nonexistent/undefined rules, especially after Eagle encouraged us to make spammy posts
EagleRock wrote:Ismael92 wrote:Being a mod doesn't mean that you must be a party pooper and enforce nonexistent/undefined rules, especially after Eagle encouraged us to make spammy posts :P
Well, there's a difference between spam and having fun. In this case, we're just having fun, but that doesn't mean making nonsense posts for no reason. In this case, we were having fun with the color system...which is okay to me. Post +1's or one-liners are okay too, assuming they have a modicum of intelligence attached to them. But if it really gets out of hand, I'll let you know to dial it back a bit. Otherwise, run free. 8-)
Ismael92 wrote:
I see. Unfortunately, I'll have to ban you for double posting.
EagleRock wrote:Ismael92 wrote:
I see. Unfortunately, I'll have to ban you for double posting.
First off, I'd like to see you try. *Dr. Evil Stare*
Second off, you don't ban the admin. That's like telling Tom he can't go on Newgrounds for a while. :D
Also, double-posting is okay if it's reasonable. In retrospect, I could've edited, but I was too lazy to copy-paste your quote. So, double-post it was. :)
Ismael92 wrote:You were too lazy to copy-paste? Well, sloth is one of the seven capital sins, so that's another ban for you, mister Admin
(Because this is obviously a Christian forum).
Ismael92 wrote:BTW, is it OK if the logo's height is longer (like 95 or 100 pixels instead of 89). I haven't made any logo yet because I don't have any good ideas
EagleRock wrote:Ismael92 wrote:You were too lazy to copy-paste? Well, sloth is one of the seven capital sins, so that's another ban for you, mister Admin :o
(Because this is obviously a Christian forum).
This is what I have to say to that.
EagleRock wrote:Ismael92 wrote:BTW, is it OK if the logo's height is longer (like 95 or 100 pixels instead of 89). I haven't made any logo yet because I don't have any good ideas :(
That's perfectly fine. I will have to adjust the height of the forum header, if you do that, but it's no big deal. Ideally, keeping it at 89 pixels will prevent any potential size issues, but 100 pixels shouldn't be too much trouble, either.
Also, width is even easier to work with. If you want to span out more to the right, feel free.
Return to Barracks Recreation Room
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests